[cadynce] Model Checking results for GT4 w 50, 48 and 46 Blades.

Gautam Thaker ghthaker at yahoo.com
Tue May 29 08:41:46 CDT 2007


Please see

https://repo.isis.vanderbilt.edu/twiki/bin/view/CADYNCE/OneFiftyFiftyCase1#1000_Allocations_using_a_modifie

where I have uploaded results of some long simulation
runs with GT4 over the memorial day weekend. Comments
welcome. All SCIs were at same priority though the
scheduling model is run to completion and not time
shared (we don't know the quanta). I believe the
results would not be too different, but hard to say.
Also, not sure how different the results would be if
we employ rate monotically assigned priorities with
preemption. A bit of care is needed there since we
have merging of flows in GT4, i assume we can inherit
the priority of the highest flowrate that merges...

I will attempt these priority based runs next in order
to gain more insights.

Gautam


       
____________________________________________________________________________________You snooze, you lose. Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck
in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_html.html


More information about the Cadynce mailing list