FW: Issues with the MetaGME paradigm

[GME]

----------
From: 	Tamas Paka
Sent: 	Tuesday, March 25, 2003 2:14:37 PM
To: 	GME Group
Subject: 	RE: Issues with the MetaGME paradigm
Auto forwarded by a Rule

Jon!

The bug is fixed...

Until the next release of GME... 
DO NOT use the call : gme::Model::connectionParts( kindName : ocl::string )
REPLACE with the call : gme::Model::connectionParts( kind : ocl::Type )

so... 
for example:
	the problematic call is:
		connectionParts( "DefaultTransition" )
	the good one is:
		connectionParts( DefaultTransition ) 

in specific:
	you have to do find the constraint called "MaxDefault_1", which is attached to the model "Test" in "TransformationLayout" sheet

Tamas


-----Original Message-----
From: GME Group 
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:48 PM
To: GME List
Subject: FW: Issues with the MetaGME paradigm




> ----------
> From: 	Tamas Paka
> Sent: 	Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:47:41 PM
> To: 	GME Group
> Subject: 	RE: Issues with the MetaGME paradigm
> Auto forwarded by a Rule
> 
I found it.... there is something wrong in the ConstraintManager..
I am on it...

sorry, for the incovenience..
Tamas

-----Original Message-----
From: GME Group 
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:26 PM
To: GME List
Subject: FW: Issues with the MetaGME paradigm




> ----------
> From: 	Jonathan Sprinkle
> Sent: 	Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:26:19 PM
> To: 	GME Group
> Subject: 	Issues with the MetaGME paradigm
> Auto forwarded by a Rule
> 
I have a fringe paradigm that I cannot get to work under GME3, with the following "fringe" components:

1) Libraries
2) Libraries of metamodels (that of course, now that we have MetaGME instead of MetaGME2000 have changed)
3) Multiple Inheritance
4) Inheritance by Proxy
5) Aspect inclusion by role (rather than kind)
6) Minnie Others

I have included the paradigm here (although I don't know if includes are allowed on this list) for anyone who wants to play with it.  My question is this: can anyone who has GME in debug mode tell me why when I try to create a new GME project using the interpreted paradigm that i immediately get an emergency-event-thanks-for-playing message??

Jon