FW: Issues with the MetaGME paradigm
GME
GME
Tue Mar 25 20:18:07 CST 2003
----------
From: Jonathan Sprinkle
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 2:18:06 PM
To: GME Group
Subject: RE: Issues with the MetaGME paradigm
Auto forwarded by a Rule
Thanks Tamas! Should I do this for all parameters that I used to pass as a string now? (e.g., models( "modelname" )) ??
> -----Original Message-----
> From: GME Group
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 2:15 PM
> To: GME List
> Subject: FW: Issues with the MetaGME paradigm
>
>
>
>
> > ----------
> > From: Tamas Paka
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 2:14:37 PM
> > To: GME Group
> > Subject: RE: Issues with the MetaGME paradigm
> > Auto forwarded by a Rule
> >
> Jon!
>
> The bug is fixed...
>
> Until the next release of GME...
> DO NOT use the call : gme::Model::connectionParts( kindName :
> ocl::string )
> REPLACE with the call : gme::Model::connectionParts( kind :
> ocl::Type )
>
> so...
> for example:
> the problematic call is:
> connectionParts( "DefaultTransition" )
> the good one is:
> connectionParts( DefaultTransition )
>
> in specific:
> you have to do find the constraint called
> "MaxDefault_1", which is attached to the model "Test" in
> "TransformationLayout" sheet
>
> Tamas
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: GME Group
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:48 PM
> To: GME List
> Subject: FW: Issues with the MetaGME paradigm
>
>
>
>
> > ----------
> > From: Tamas Paka
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:47:41 PM
> > To: GME Group
> > Subject: RE: Issues with the MetaGME paradigm
> > Auto forwarded by a Rule
> >
> I found it.... there is something wrong in the ConstraintManager..
> I am on it...
>
> sorry, for the incovenience..
> Tamas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: GME Group
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:26 PM
> To: GME List
> Subject: FW: Issues with the MetaGME paradigm
>
>
>
>
> > ----------
> > From: Jonathan Sprinkle
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:26:19 PM
> > To: GME Group
> > Subject: Issues with the MetaGME paradigm
> > Auto forwarded by a Rule
> >
> I have a fringe paradigm that I cannot get to work under
> GME3, with the following "fringe" components:
>
> 1) Libraries
> 2) Libraries of metamodels (that of course, now that we have
> MetaGME instead of MetaGME2000 have changed)
> 3) Multiple Inheritance
> 4) Inheritance by Proxy
> 5) Aspect inclusion by role (rather than kind)
> 6) Minnie Others
>
> I have included the paradigm here (although I don't know if
> includes are allowed on this list) for anyone who wants to
> play with it. My question is this: can anyone who has GME in
> debug mode tell me why when I try to create a new GME project
> using the interpreted paradigm that i immediately get an
> emergency-event-thanks-for-playing message??
>
> Jon
>
More information about the gme-users
mailing list